Sometimes the appalling food and agri situation in the world
in general and in the USD in particular gets just too heavy. Then one must
crawl into one’s cave for a bit or the opposite; indulge in a flight on the
wings of fantasy. This week I’m opting for the latter.
First, let’s imagine
that blueberries, nuts, sweet potatoes and kidney beans were subsidized in the US
instead of corn and soybeans. We can start with the certainties, such as
the fact that fast food and convenience food, meat and the hundreds of products
made from corn would become more expensive.
Then one can let the
imagination have free rein:
Iowa might become known as the fruit and veggie belt instead of
the Corn Belt.
The Brazilian rainforest might be saved from being turned into
soybean farms
Toasted nuts might become the snack of choice. Dense in healthy
fats, they also teem with valuable minerals.
Thai veggie soup and Pad Thai with lots of added veggies might
replace pizza at the local fast-food restaurant
Convenience food might mean precut and peeled veggies – fresh
or frozen - in combination to make easy, inexpensive one-dish meals. Grocery
stores already have a hot soup pot and a salad bar; surely they could add an
inexpensive one-dish healthy meal pot? I’m thinking of chili sin carne or with a little carne,
ratatouille and the like. Corner stores, at which many of the poor shop, could
sell precut mixed veggies for stir-fries etc. Friday might be pizza day, with a
bag containing a roll of pizza dough, the aforementioned pre-cut veggies and
herbs, a small tub of tomato sauce and a ball of mozzarella. Customers could
bring their own bags or tubs.
The certain results
of all this? A healthier population, a decrease in medical costs, a
reversal in the present shocking life expectancy trend, which is that the youth
of today have a shorter life expectancy than their parents.
Are such subsidies
realistic? Not at present, with the enormous power of big aggie behind the
present subsidies. More realistic, perhaps, would be a tax on fast food and
sugar, like the tax on alcohol and tobacco.
And now let’s suppose
that fossil fuel subsidies were given instead to alternative energy projects. Some
ensuing situations seem pretty certain:
There would be political repercussions, as
relations with states from which we import oil would change.
Coal mining and fracking would slow down and then stop, as coal
and oil would no longer be economically competitive.
Air quality would improve and global warming would be slowed.
Electric cars and bikes would become much more popular and less
expensive. Those solar panels would be necessary to provide the juice for the
batteries.
There would have to be more and better public transport,
company mini-bus solutions and the like.
Once again, let’s
imagine:
I have a picture of the following: very small electric carts
– two-seaters and four-seaters – are stationed here and there throughout the
community. One can call up one of these carts on the computer, whereupon it
arrives automatically at one’s front door, perhaps on tracks laid in the street
like tram tracks. Once aboard, one programs in one’s destination and is ferried
there, again automatically. The system includes automatic braking in case of
threatened collision. One pays via credit card. These systems would function
mostly in the suburbs and countryside. One can dream…
Big oil might become big energy, featuring a broad band
of alternative technologies. The oil companies have money, clout, international
presence and experience with marketing, all of which could be put to good use
in the alternative energy field. As I say, one can dream.
No comments:
Post a Comment