Hunger for Justice: the Immorality of our present food system
It came as a surprise to me,
and perhaps it will to you, to learn that the right to food is included in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, enacted in 1948. Article 25 begins, “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for
the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food…………….”.
Given that the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimated in
2012 that there were 868 million undernourished people in the world, it is
staggering to see in various sources that from 30% to 50% of worldwide food production rots or is thrown
away. It would seem that the above right is not being implemented very
satisfactorily.
What is going on here?
Although starvation is partly caused by local factors like civil unrest and the
effects of climate change, the data above point to a severe dislocation in the
worldwide supply of food. This is the theme of the book Stuffed and Starved, by Raj Patel. In the
introduction he tells us that the “stuffed” – the obese – are victims of the
same problem as the “starved”: food production as it is now practiced on a
global scale. Corporations, in other words, control what and how and whether we
eat.
Let’s consider
the “stuffed” aspect first. In 2013 there are enough calories available in the
“land of the feed” to feed every US citizen twice over. Even subtracting the
food that rots, is thrown away or sold and given in aid programs abroad, a
great surplus still remains. It is therefore not surprising that food
production firms do everything in their power to sell more food. Every time the
US government has updated its dietary goals, the food industry has objected to
any statement that could be construed to mean “eat less”, although from the
health point of view that is exactly the advice many citizens need. Already in
1997 American children got 50% of their calories from added fat and sugar, a
situation that has only gotten worse. Industry opposes government regulation,
tries to discredit nutritional recommendations and intimidates critics.
The government,
meanwhile, issues dietary recommendations with its right hand while using the
left to subsidize the corn and soy used as animal feed or in so many products
of no or little nutritional value. Fruits and veggies are not subsidized. As
sweets and soft drinks offer up to 4 times the calories in the carrots that
could be bought for the same money, healthy food is available only to those who
can afford it. Not exactly what the Universal Declaration on Human Rights had
in mind.
But now let’s
turn to an even more dismal aspect of agribusiness, its contribution to growing
numbers of starving humans. Soybean cultivation in South America feeds animals
in Europe, while local farmers are forced off their land and starve. We have
spoken of subsidies, which lead to overproduction that is exported to poor
countries whether they want it or not, ruining their own local agriculture. “Free trade has nothing to do with freedom”, as Jean
Ziegler, the former United Nations Special Rapporteur
on the Right to Food from 2000 to April 2008, commented, “ it’s the
freedom of the predatory animal in the jungle” .
A modern addition
to the causes of starvation is the subsidized use of corn for the production of
biofuel, a practice that has little effect on carbon dioxide reduction but
which has raised the price of corn dramatically. Stock market speculation on
food has driven up prices as well.
Finally, the principles
of the green revolution no longer apply; new principles need to be taught and
implemented.
Solutions to
these blatant perversions of food production abound: bring back local food
production, better regulate hedge funds dealing with food, stop subsidizing
biofuel, or produce it from waste organic raw material, are some that are
gaining ground but slowly in the face of the enormous power wielded by
agribusiness.
But isn’t there a
far more basic cause of this extreme dislocation in food production and
dissemination? Isn’t it simply morally
wrong to treat food as just another commodity, like computers and printers?
Should it be treated as the responsibility of a public utility, like water? Or
partially government regulated, like health insurance in Switzerland?
Of course food is
different from water in being far more complex. But it is ethically similar in
there is a difference between what we need and what we want. We need to drink a
certain amount of water each day; we do not need to water lawns or fill
swimming pools. Indeed, it is just these uses that are forbidden in times of
water shortages. Should certain practices, like forbidding speculation on food,
be instituted?
Or should food production be
treated like health insurance here in Switzerland? This would mean basic
“packages”, government required and regulated, sold by private concerns in
competition with one another. More luxurious food would be available to those
who could afford it, but everyone would have the required basic food supply.
It is clear that
reforming our food system in any meaningful way will be enormously complicated,
particularly because agribusiness as it is presently practiced has such clout
on the world market and in the seats of government. But to say it is impossible
is to be complacent about the fact that obesity is now one of the most
widespread medical problems in children and adolescents in the United States
and other developed countries, while 1 in 8 people in the world go to sleep
hungry every night.
It is also to say
that the rights of agribusiness to continue its present practices unfettered
are more important than the human rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Do we really
believe this?
Sources and suggested
reading
http://www.fao.org/hunger/en/
Food Politics, Marion Nestle
The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan
The film We Feed the World
Stolen Harvest:
The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply
by Vandana Shiva
World Hunger: Twelve Myths by Frances Moore Lappe, Joseph Collins,
Peter Rosse and Luis Esparza
In Defense of Food, by Michael Pollan
No comments:
Post a Comment